Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Cute Ideas 2010 For Sororities



Hello,

Today I saw a story that I find useful to see the usefulness of checking the information, but I did not check, I hope you will forgive me, but time does not give me.

The story basically says that you get emails saying that Costa Rica will take to sell turtle eggs, doing wrong to the environment and, of course, turtles. To prove the fact, images are attached to "prove" abuse.

The issue is that the images, it seems (I do not get stuck if the journalist did not look good), are a government program to protect turtles blessed because when it comes the arrival of a new flock (excuse me if you do not know how to call a group of turtles) new turtles break some eggs trying to spawn. For those interested, the news is in:

http://www.clarin.com/internet/extrano-tortugas-marinas-Costa-Rica_0_461354117.html

The good thing, I think, is that the same image (say, the same information) distortion, you can do to think about something completely different. Something objective, such as a photo is used to prove two points complete opposites.

I think it's important for our task, because the issue of ethics is usually only limited to data collection, now, for the analysis is normally not mention it, but there is also an important ethical issue in that aspect because as we see, it can completely distort the point if given another interpretation.

Renault Consider the case where an employee (do not know if envious or to earn money) messed others who had nothing to do and over the accused to work on "competitive intelligence", which incidentally does not try to steal information, but taking different pieces of information ethically and above all legal things (the intelligence is obviously not legal) and give respect in order to support the decisions that have to take the lead. Most copied the information media, no one checked and when it proved wrong, as I know at least, only the Wall Street Journal reported that it was false.

to me what I thought was wrong in that case is that dirty the name of Renault employees who theoretically had participated in that maneuver and our profession. In addition, except the Wall Street Journal published an amendment no.

Well, I think we can not ask the impossible tampoco ...

Un abrazo, Adrian Alvarez Lic



Founding Partner
Midas Consulting
Direct Phone (Argentina):
Direct Phone +54-11-4775-8983 (Brazil): +55-11-3010-1685

http://www.midasconsulting.com.ar/

0 comments:

Post a Comment